Market Loss Assistance Program in Harford County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 179
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Harford County, Maryland totaled $2,326,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | C Edwin Grimmel Jr | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $138,453 |
2 | Martin Brothers Ptr | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $93,447 |
3 | Highland Heights Farm Inc | Street, MD 21154 | $72,275 |
4 | Rutledge Brick House Farm Inc | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $62,721 |
5 | William Thomas Moore Jr | Churchville, MD 21028 | $60,927 |
6 | Pieper Brothers Ptr | White Hall, MD 21161 | $55,374 |
7 | James H Archer Jr | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $55,157 |
8 | Parlett Brothers Ptr | Baltimore, MD 21220 | $54,833 |
9 | Geraldine Miller Estate | Darlington, MD 21034 | $51,856 |
10 | F O Mitchell Bro Inc | Perryman, MD 21130 | $48,232 |
11 | Dougherty Bros | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $45,444 |
12 | Stephen T Pieper | White Hall, MD 21161 | $45,072 |
13 | W Herbert Harkins | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $42,535 |
14 | Twin Pine Farms No | Whiteford, MD 21160 | $42,454 |
15 | Garden Fence Farm LLC | Street, MD 21154 | $41,528 |
16 | Charles L Pieper Jr | White Hall, MD 21161 | $41,440 |
17 | Carl William Nash Jr | Street, MD 21154 | $36,778 |
18 | Ehrhardt Farms Inc | Baldwin, MD 21013 | $36,744 |
19 | John L Schenning | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $35,895 |
20 | Maroamo Farms Ptr | Street, MD 21154 | $35,262 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>