Total Commodity Programs in Harford County, Maryland, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 118
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Harford County, Maryland totaled $3,857,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | My Lady's Manor Farm Inc | Monkton, MD 21111 | $354,352 |
2 | Grimmel Farm Partners | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $341,497 |
3 | Foxborough Nursery Inc | Street, MD 21154 | $322,271 |
4 | Rutledge Brick House Farm Inc | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $230,938 |
5 | James H Archer Jr | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $217,448 |
6 | Blue Valley Farms LLC | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $164,048 |
7 | Twin Pine Farm Inc | Whiteford, MD 21160 | $146,225 |
8 | Rigdon Farms Inc | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $134,251 |
9 | Strawberry Hill Farm LLC | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $118,811 |
10 | Holloway Brothers Ptr | Darlington, MD 21034 | $107,623 |
11 | Ma & Pa Holstein/julie Yarrington | Street, MD 21154 | $95,843 |
12 | W Herbert Harkins | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $92,971 |
13 | Thomas Adams III | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $91,710 |
14 | Piedmont Ridge Enterprises LLC | White Hall, MD 21161 | $86,046 |
15 | William Thomas Moore Jr | Churchville, MD 21028 | $85,104 |
16 | Stephen T Pieper | White Hall, MD 21161 | $81,417 |
17 | Quietness Farm LLC | White Hall, MD 21161 | $73,137 |
18 | David M Keyes | Aberdeen, MD 21001 | $65,137 |
19 | Katharine Umbarger-dallam | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $60,947 |
20 | Douglas H Smith Jr | Street, MD 21154 | $51,279 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>