Farm Subsidy information
Queen Anne's County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Queen Anne's County, Maryland, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 281
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Queen Anne's County, Maryland totaled $5,326,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mitchell Rhodes Leager | Millington, MD 21651 | $5,917 |
102 | Mary Alice Jackson | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $5,815 |
103 | Apple's Acres LLC | Ingleside, MD 21644 | $5,776 |
104 | Patricia A Hunter | Crumpton, MD 21628 | $5,712 |
105 | Neff & Son Inc | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $5,624 |
106 | Jck Farms LLC | Queenstown, MD 21658 | $5,609 |
107 | Henry Covington Jr | Centreville, MD 21617 | $5,549 |
108 | Shellcross Farms LLC | Centreville, MD 21617 | $5,516 |
109 | , | $5,489 | |
110 | Eugene F Boyle | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $5,448 |
111 | William V Eaton | Centreville, MD 21617 | $5,413 |
112 | Ernest A Darling | Barclay, MD 21607 | $5,226 |
113 | Mason's Legacy LLC | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $5,192 |
114 | Howard Cook | Centreville, MD 21617 | $5,185 |
115 | Pippin LLC | Centreville, MD 21617 | $5,084 |
116 | Larry Clifton | Church Hill, MD 21623 | $4,891 |
117 | Michael R Bostic | Church Hill, MD 21623 | $4,882 |
118 | Schmidt Brothers LLC | Sudlersville, MD 21668 | $4,854 |
119 | Greenville Farm LLC | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $4,841 |
120 | David Denny Farms LLC | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $4,700 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”