Total Conservation Programs in Talbot County, Maryland, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 194
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Talbot County, Maryland totaled $931,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hollywood Farm LLC | Oxford, MD 21654 | $88,965 |
2 | Chesapeake Audubon Society Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $31,350 |
3 | Wise Holdings LLC | Trappe, MD 21673 | $31,178 |
4 | Julian Nave | Trappe, MD 21673 | $29,902 |
5 | Duvall Farm LLC | Oxford, MD 21654 | $21,749 |
6 | Mt Pleasant Farm Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $21,539 |
7 | W Harold Lyons | Easton, MD 21601 | $21,415 |
8 | Residuary Trust U/w Of John L Firth | Easton, MD 21601 | $21,014 |
9 | Widgeon Point Farm LLC | Oxford, MD 21654 | $16,779 |
10 | James L Crothers | Easton, MD 21601 | $15,298 |
11 | Irvin Knauer Jr | Trappe, MD 21673 | $15,224 |
12 | Harleigh Farm LLC | Oxford, MD 21654 | $15,170 |
13 | Sans Souci Farm Association Inc | Mcdaniel, MD 21647 | $14,945 |
14 | Kirby Wharf Investments LLC | Trappe, MD 21673 | $14,936 |
15 | Delahay Family Lmtd Partnership | Oxford, MD 21654 | $13,853 |
16 | Audrey Callahan | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $13,744 |
17 | Levin Henry Schwaninger Jr | Trappe, MD 21673 | $12,886 |
18 | Old Womans Folly LLC | Royal Oak, MD 21662 | $11,797 |
19 | Jr Bolling Owf LLC | Wilmington, DE 19807 | $11,796 |
20 | John D Hulseman | Oxford, MD 21654 | $11,576 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>