Farm Subsidy information
Worcester County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Worcester County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 273
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $4,250,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Donald O Culver | Salisbury, MD 21804 | $4,774 |
122 | M Wayne Lambertson | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $4,724 |
123 | Carol Twigg Hales | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $4,624 |
124 | The Taylor Family Business Inc | Salisbury, MD 21801 | $4,595 |
125 | William Holloway | Berlin, MD 21811 | $4,495 |
126 | Hilda M Shaffer | Salisbury, MD 21804 | $4,448 |
127 | Edward Phillips Jr | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $4,377 |
128 | Stephen W Pusey | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $4,082 |
129 | Shirley W Carmean | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $4,055 |
130 | William F West Jr | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $4,055 |
131 | Eugene Magee | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $3,936 |
132 | Michael Beauchamp | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $3,853 |
133 | Ethel June Pettit | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $3,742 |
134 | Estate Of Anne B Warner | Severn, MD 21144 | $3,506 |
135 | Dale J S Abbott | Eden, MD 21822 | $3,359 |
136 | Harrison Farms | Ocean City, MD 21843 | $3,321 |
137 | David M Age | Newark, MD 21841 | $3,244 |
138 | W T Holland & Sons Inc | New Church, VA 23415 | $3,182 |
139 | Diane Lambertson - Diane B Lambertson Revocable Tr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $3,124 |
140 | Sally A Molnar | Berlin, MD 21811 | $3,087 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”