Total Commodity Programs in Worcester County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 136
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $1,796,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith Family Limited Partnership | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $188,086 |
| 2 | Murray Brothers LLC | Selbyville, DE 19975 | $96,070 |
| 3 | Lambertson Farms Inc | Stockton, MD 21864 | $89,352 |
| 4 | H Watson Powell Jr | Newark, MD 21841 | $69,257 |
| 5 | Tull Farms Inc | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $67,450 |
| 6 | K&c Farms Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $63,581 |
| 7 | Newark Grain Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $59,367 |
| 8 | Roger L Richardson | Eden, MD 21822 | $56,821 |
| 9 | Everett D Holland & Sons Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $53,185 |
| 10 | Twin Oak Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $48,415 |
| 11 | Chesapeake Bay Dairy LLC | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $46,975 |
| 12 | Queponco Farms Inc | Newark, MD 21841 | $43,373 |
| 13 | Aydelotte Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $42,660 |
| 14 | Ag Renewal Enterprises Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $41,815 |
| 15 | F A Holland & Sons | New Church, VA 23415 | $39,327 |
| 16 | Holland Land Company | New Church, VA 23415 | $38,743 |
| 17 | Holloway Brothers | Berlin, MD 21811 | $36,025 |
| 18 | B & R Farms LLC | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $35,485 |
| 19 | Dale Holland | Greenbackville, VA 23356 | $29,935 |
| 20 | George H Dryden Jr | Newark, MD 21841 | $29,372 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf