Farm Subsidy information
Worcester County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Worcester County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 273
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $4,250,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Nancie W Mulligan | Salisbury, MD 21804 | $3,078 |
142 | Beckyfield Farms Inc | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $2,977 |
143 | The Nest Inc | Newark, MD 21841 | $2,972 |
144 | Millennium Farms Partnership | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $2,910 |
145 | Virgil L Shockley | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $2,893 |
146 | Estate Of Jefferson Riley Grey | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $2,890 |
147 | John W Bunting | Berlin, MD 21811 | $2,864 |
148 | Lisa Ann Phillips | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $2,850 |
149 | Julia C Dickerson | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $2,767 |
150 | Goody Hill Farms Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $2,742 |
151 | Thomas W Wilkins | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $2,705 |
152 | Walter F Pusey | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $2,700 |
153 | Donna R West | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $2,689 |
154 | David M Evans | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $2,591 |
155 | Michael W Sirman | Newark, MD 21841 | $2,461 |
156 | Edward A Williams Jr | Chesapeake, VA 23323 | $2,458 |
157 | Edward A Williams | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $2,458 |
158 | James P Hitch Jr | Eden, MD 21822 | $2,453 |
159 | Thomas Morris | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $2,417 |
160 | Charles Alan Pennewell | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $2,402 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”