Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Worcester County, Maryland, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 26
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $28,041 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tull Farms Inc | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $9,227 |
2 | Everett D Holland & Sons Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $6,580 |
3 | Queponco Farms Inc | Newark, MD 21841 | $2,398 |
4 | Mark Drew | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $1,804 |
5 | Murray Brothers LLC | Selbyville, DE 19975 | $1,124 |
6 | Smith Family Limited Partnership | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $884 |
7 | Percy S Maddux | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $860 |
8 | Newark Grain Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $851 |
9 | Bryan J Truitt Sr | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $773 |
10 | Dale Holland | Greenbackville, VA 23356 | $541 |
11 | K&c Farms Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $541 |
12 | David K Baker Sr | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $462 |
13 | Rayne Acres LLC | Willards, MD 21874 | $426 |
14 | Aydelotte Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $413 |
15 | Garet W Bunting | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $191 |
16 | Ennis Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $181 |
17 | Lisa Ann Phillips | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $171 |
18 | Shimar Farms Trust Under The Will Of Mark O Pilcha | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $123 |
19 | Brooks Aydelotte | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $120 |
20 | John H Shockley | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $92 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>