Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Worcester County, Maryland, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 136
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $4,597,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Smith Family Limited Partnership | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $362,500 |
2 | Murray Brothers LLC | Selbyville, DE 19975 | $287,013 |
3 | Lambertson Farms Inc | Stockton, MD 21864 | $259,938 |
4 | K&c Farms Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $231,945 |
5 | Newark Grain Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $217,704 |
6 | H Watson Powell Jr | Newark, MD 21841 | $209,311 |
7 | Aydelotte Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $190,159 |
8 | Tull Farms Inc | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $180,722 |
9 | Everett D Holland & Sons Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $171,594 |
10 | B & R Farms LLC | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $110,014 |
11 | Watson Powell Farms Inc | Newark, MD 21841 | $109,212 |
12 | George H Dryden Jr | Newark, MD 21841 | $107,663 |
13 | Roger L Richardson | Eden, MD 21822 | $101,459 |
14 | Glad Mar Grain Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $87,630 |
15 | Byron Hauck | Girdletree, MD 21829 | $77,970 |
16 | Mark Drew | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $77,732 |
17 | Queponco Farms Inc | Newark, MD 21841 | $76,713 |
18 | Clayville Farm | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $75,784 |
19 | David F Shockley | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $73,075 |
20 | Holland Land Company | New Church, VA 23415 | $72,395 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>