Emergency Conservation Program in Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 656
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Massachusetts totaled $6,738,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robert Keelips III | Hardwick, MA 01037 | $29,664 |
42 | Keith A Dufresne | Williamsburg, MA 01096 | $29,637 |
43 | Roseann Degrenier | Wareham, MA 02571 | $28,882 |
44 | Crescent Farm LLC | Ward Hill, MA 01835 | $28,473 |
45 | Lukas Bjorklund | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $27,422 |
46 | Todd A Poirot | Drury, MA 01343 | $27,392 |
47 | Bigelow Nurseries Inc | Boylston, MA 01505 | $26,691 |
48 | Manuel S Moreira | Lancaster, MA 01523 | $26,448 |
49 | Barry Isenstein | Deerfield, MA 01342 | $26,125 |
50 | Paul Gove | Leominster, MA 01453 | $26,111 |
51 | Edward Caron Sr | Leyden, MA 01337 | $25,346 |
52 | Double S Farm LLC | Westport, MA 02790 | $25,265 |
53 | Carter And Stevens Farm LLC | Barre, MA 01005 | $25,040 |
54 | Broadlawn Farm | Adams, MA 01220 | $24,630 |
55 | Ryan Brothers | Colrain, MA 01340 | $24,390 |
56 | Gilmore Cranberry Company | South Carver, MA 02366 | $23,747 |
57 | John F Mello | East Freetown, MA 02717 | $23,692 |
58 | The Red Apple Farm LLC | Phillipston, MA 01331 | $23,496 |
59 | Carlson Orchards Inc | Harvard, MA 01451 | $23,310 |
60 | Douglas C Burnett Jr | Adams, MA 01220 | $22,956 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”