Emergency Conservation Program in Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 656
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Massachusetts totaled $6,738,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | William Mccaffrey | East Taunton, MA 02718 | $18,638 |
82 | Roberts Brothers Lumber Co Inc | Ashfield, MA 01330 | $18,330 |
83 | Karen Herzig Dba Coombs Hill Farm | Colrain, MA 01340 | $18,313 |
84 | Ordera Smale | Lakeville, MA 02347 | $18,073 |
85 | David P Crowell | Plainfield, MA 01070 | $18,026 |
86 | William Couto | East Taunton, MA 02718 | $18,000 |
87 | Dianna Provencher | Leicester, MA 01524 | $17,794 |
88 | Matthew Leclerc | Templeton, MA 01468 | $17,741 |
89 | David H Gage | Worthington, MA 01098 | $17,656 |
90 | Bar-way Farm Inc | Deerfield, MA 01342 | $17,592 |
91 | Matthew Martin | Ashfield, MA 01330 | $17,480 |
92 | , | $17,321 | |
93 | Paul Willis Dba Clessons River Farm | Buckland, MA 01338 | $16,728 |
94 | Yazwinski Farm Partnership | Deerfield, MA 01342 | $16,606 |
95 | Neil G Johnson | Brookfield, MA 01506 | $16,338 |
96 | Brian Mcphee | Ashby, MA 01431 | $16,229 |
97 | Royal Crest Farm LLC | Spencer, MA 01562 | $16,196 |
98 | Connors Farm Inc | Danvers, MA 01923 | $16,192 |
99 | Weston's Hill Cranberries Inc | Carver, MA 02330 | $15,978 |
100 | Seth Seraphine Lewis | Westport, MA 02790 | $15,831 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”