Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 334
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Massachusetts totaled $11,741,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Evergreen Honey Co Inc | Billerica, MA 01821 | $5,607,744 |
2 | Merrimack Valley Apiaries Inc | Billerica, MA 01821 | $1,596,383 |
3 | Beth Doyle | Plymouth, MA 02360 | $702,555 |
4 | Boston Honey Company Inc | Holliston, MA 01746 | $483,527 |
5 | , | $312,817 | |
6 | Sandy Neck Oyster Company | West Barnstable, MA 02668 | $279,556 |
7 | Scott V Doyle | Duxbury, MA 02332 | $228,184 |
8 | Peter Orcutt | Orleans, MA 02653 | $218,623 |
9 | James Davenport | South Dennis, MA 02660 | $210,904 |
10 | , | $209,072 | |
11 | 1620 Oyster Company | Plymouth, MA 02360 | $205,114 |
12 | , | $185,739 | |
13 | Scott D Mullin | West Barnstable, MA 02668 | $145,627 |
14 | Ethan D Estey | South Wellfleet, MA 02663 | $144,521 |
15 | Jonathan Martin | Barnstable, MA 02630 | $135,731 |
16 | New England Apiaries LLC | Westfield, MA 01086 | $132,535 |
17 | James P O'shea | Plymouth, MA 02360 | $130,778 |
18 | William D Crawford III | Southwick, MA 01077 | $117,929 |
19 | Cape Cod Oyster Co Inc | Marstons Mills, MA 02648 | $111,849 |
20 | Boston Honey Company Inc | Holliston, MA 01746 | $102,957 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>