CCC Organic Programs in Massachusetts, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 104
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in Massachusetts totaled $131,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Maple Shade Farm Inc | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $6,500 |
2 | Julia Rolin Coffey | South Deerfield, MA 01373 | $5,988 |
3 | Freedom Food Farm, LLC | Raynham, MA 02767 | $4,870 |
4 | Blue Heron Farm | Charlemont, MA 01339 | $4,825 |
5 | Lakeside Organics Of Hadley LLC | Hadley, MA 01035 | $3,500 |
6 | Old Friends Farm LLC | Amherst, MA 01004 | $3,425 |
7 | King Fisher Corporation | Lakeville, MA 02347 | $3,245 |
8 | Domingo Fernandes | Carver, MA 02330 | $3,075 |
9 | Stanley E Lowell | Carver, MA 02330 | $2,975 |
10 | Sidehill Farm LLC | Hawley, MA 01339 | $2,650 |
11 | Berkshire Wildflower Honey LLC | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $2,565 |
12 | Ryan Voiland | Granby, MA 01033 | $2,250 |
13 | Elaine Morley Dba Couch Brook Farm | Bernardston, MA 01337 | $2,055 |
14 | James C. Cannell Coffees, Inc. | West Wareham, MA 02576 | $2,002 |
15 | Cape Cod Ginger LLC | Wareham, MA 02571 | $2,001 |
16 | Fairland Farm LLC | North Attleboro, MA 02760 | $2,000 |
17 | The Kitchen Garden, LLC | Sunderland, MA 01375 | $2,000 |
18 | Ioka Valley Farm LLC | Hancock, MA 01237 | $1,900 |
19 | David H Gage | Worthington, MA 01098 | $1,850 |
20 | Rodney A Fielding | East Wareham, MA 02538 | $1,755 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>