Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Michigan, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 83
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Michigan totaled $1,647,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Peter Vanden Bogerd | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $24,225 |
22 | Rhoadside Acres Inc | Cedar, MI 49621 | $22,104 |
23 | James R Love | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $21,118 |
24 | Anthony W Bergstrom | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $18,546 |
25 | Mccallum's Orchard & Cider Mill, LLC | Jeddo, MI 48032 | $17,834 |
26 | Hallstedt Homestead LLC | Northport, MI 49670 | $17,747 |
27 | Jon Haindl | Cooks, MI 49817 | $17,556 |
28 | Joseph B Herman | Benton Harbor, MI 49022 | $16,467 |
29 | Jm Land Ventures LLC 2019- | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $15,597 |
30 | Brent And Gerald Cottle | Pickford, MI 49774 | $15,188 |
31 | Heidt Cellar Farming LLC | Cincinnati, OH 45243 | $14,640 |
32 | Duane Marenger | Gladstone, MI 49837 | $14,302 |
33 | Legacy Orchards Inc | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $13,147 |
34 | Miller Brothers Orchard | Bear Lake, MI 49614 | $13,117 |
35 | S P Grossnickle LLC | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $12,952 |
36 | Eric Mckerchie | Sault S Marie, MI 49783 | $12,194 |
37 | Moondog Vineyards LLC | Kewadin, MI 49648 | $11,435 |
38 | , | $10,916 | |
39 | Gallagher Family Estate Inc | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $10,655 |
40 | Mario Tabone | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $9,874 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”