Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,235
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Michigan totaled $66,638,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hackert Family Farms | Ludington, MI 49431 | $920,995 |
2 | Hamlin Farms | South Haven, MI 49090 | $800,000 |
3 | Calvin Lutz II | Kaleva, MI 49645 | $639,649 |
4 | Wolak Farms Limited Partnership | Armada, MI 48005 | $611,662 |
5 | Stephanie Joy Frank | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $557,920 |
6 | N J Fox & Sons Inc | Shelby, MI 49455 | $547,803 |
7 | Carol Dominion | Benton Harbor, MI 49022 | $521,802 |
8 | Daniel M Dominion | Benton Harbor, MI 49022 | $507,855 |
9 | S&s Farms Inc | Berrien Center, MI 49102 | $464,464 |
10 | Amos Farms LLC Dorance M Amos | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $459,516 |
11 | Franklin Thomas James | Sodus, MI 49126 | $436,809 |
12 | Dominion Bros Inc | Benton Harbor, MI 49022 | $417,387 |
13 | Dusseau Farms LLC | Deerfield, MI 49238 | $400,168 |
14 | Arrowhead Vineyards LLC | Baroda, MI 49101 | $398,800 |
15 | Sandy View Farm General Partnership | Hamilton, MI 49419 | $395,942 |
16 | Douglas E Meachum | Hartford, MI 49057 | $373,110 |
17 | James Louis Scherer | Bloomingdale, MI 49026 | $367,309 |
18 | Aaa Turf Inc | Hudsonville, MI 49426 | $356,513 |
19 | Charles M Muvrin Jr Estate | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $337,455 |
20 | Glenn F Lacross | Cedar, MI 49621 | $336,521 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>