Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Michigan, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 34
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Michigan totaled $573,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | T M Klein & Sons, Inc | Saint Charles, MI 48655 | $125,080 |
2 | J & J Bee Service Inc | Kalamazoo, MI 49004 | $116,750 |
3 | Arnold Apiaries Inc | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $71,216 |
4 | Oren D Best | Sunfield, MI 48890 | $61,290 |
5 | Brian N Hannar | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $43,001 |
6 | Shoreline Honey Farm LLC | Hudsonville, MI 49426 | $30,960 |
7 | Peter W Kreiner | Marlette, MI 48453 | $22,594 |
8 | Queen Bee Enterprises Inc | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $17,820 |
9 | Robert A Hollis | Almont, MI 48003 | $14,907 |
10 | Rodney Jack Hubbard | Pierson, MI 49339 | $14,580 |
11 | Timberidge Apiaries | Waldron, MI 49288 | $6,816 |
12 | Jubal Handrich - Applebee Farms | Fairview, MI 48621 | $6,406 |
13 | Kolar Farms LLC | Minden City, MI 48456 | $5,703 |
14 | Thomas Nebel | Gladstone, MI 49837 | $4,297 |
15 | B Jon Oberlin | Lakeview, MI 48850 | $4,208 |
16 | Iacob Ureche | Clinton, MI 49236 | $3,770 |
17 | Carl Ray Frantz | Capac, MI 48014 | $3,707 |
18 | Joshua Kieliszewski | Unionville, MI 48767 | $3,457 |
19 | Rodney A Bear | National City, MI 48748 | $2,897 |
20 | Sam P. Parise | Pleasant Ridge, MI 48069 | $1,780 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>