Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Allegan County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 54
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Allegan County, Michigan totaled $1,514,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hamlin Farms | South Haven, MI 49090 | $800,000 |
2 | Sandy View Farm General Partnership | Hamilton, MI 49419 | $179,694 |
3 | Daryl Dean Coffey | Hamilton, MI 49419 | $103,936 |
4 | A W Overhiser Orchards | South Haven, MI 49090 | $75,974 |
5 | Nutrien Ag Solutions | Spanish Fort, AL 36527 | $73,703 |
6 | Gary Hunsberger | Fennville, MI 49408 | $52,689 |
7 | Ann Metro | Fennville, MI 49408 | $28,819 |
8 | Dailey Plantations Inc | South Haven, MI 49090 | $19,690 |
9 | Peter Vanden Bogerd | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $19,533 |
10 | Ella Wadsworth | Fennville, MI 49408 | $17,963 |
11 | Velma Blair | Grand Junction, MI 49056 | $13,230 |
12 | Dailey Baseline Farms | South Haven, MI 49090 | $12,200 |
13 | Daniel J Ciesla | Fennville, MI 49408 | $9,857 |
14 | Thomas H Bodtke | South Haven, MI 49090 | $8,331 |
15 | Mann Orchards | Fennville, MI 49408 | $7,967 |
16 | Ida Middleton | Bangor, MI 49013 | $7,870 |
17 | George Latchaw | Pullman, MI 49450 | $6,973 |
18 | Overhiser Orchards LLC | South Haven, MI 49090 | $6,951 |
19 | Sumners Blueberry Farms Inc | South Haven, MI 49090 | $6,141 |
20 | David Skinner | Fennville, MI 49408 | $5,397 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>