Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Bay County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 367
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Bay County, Michigan totaled $2,547,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bernie Cianek | Linwood, MI 48634 | $16,171 |
42 | Ron Ratajczak | Essexville, MI 48732 | $16,150 |
43 | Philip Bublitz | Bay City, MI 48708 | $15,902 |
44 | Chris Tim Schmidt | Auburn, MI 48611 | $15,709 |
45 | Pk Farms Inc | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $15,702 |
46 | Fleischmann Farms Inc | Munger, MI 48747 | $15,391 |
47 | Michael S Hayward | Bay City, MI 48708 | $14,802 |
48 | Paul G Wackerle | Linwood, MI 48634 | $14,779 |
49 | Bryan Schwab | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $14,752 |
50 | Frank Farms Inc | Bay City, MI 48706 | $14,673 |
51 | Peter D Ratajczak | Munger, MI 48747 | $14,207 |
52 | Mieske Farms Inc | Linwood, MI 48634 | $14,203 |
53 | D T Rouech Farms LLC | Bay City, MI 48708 | $14,177 |
54 | Schindler Farms LLC | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $14,166 |
55 | Hribek Farms, LLC | Linwood, MI 48634 | $13,851 |
56 | Les Helmreich | Freeland, MI 48623 | $13,829 |
57 | Hoerauf & Appold Inc | Bay City, MI 48706 | $13,055 |
58 | Charles F Hartley | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $12,652 |
59 | Jacob A Helmreich | Bay City, MI 48706 | $12,631 |
60 | C & K Ratajczak Family Farms, LLC | Munger, MI 48747 | $12,523 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”