Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Bay County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 383
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Bay County, Michigan totaled $7,485,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hampton Potato Growers LLC | Essexville, MI 48732 | $250,000 |
2 | M & K Farms Inc | Fairgrove, MI 48733 | $182,647 |
3 | Weber Dairy Farms LLC | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $171,553 |
4 | Michael J Krzyzaniak | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $166,930 |
5 | John P Burk | Bay City, MI 48706 | $147,722 |
6 | Meylan Farms Inc | Auburn, MI 48611 | $138,648 |
7 | Stockmeyer Family Farms | Reese, MI 48757 | $127,398 |
8 | Helmreich Farms Inc | Freeland, MI 48623 | $110,353 |
9 | Deshano Farms Inc | Auburn, MI 48611 | $103,465 |
10 | Jonas Farms | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $97,119 |
11 | Jeffrey Feinauer | Bay City, MI 48706 | $81,940 |
12 | Michael Herman Schmidt | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $81,499 |
13 | Jmh Farms Inc | Saginaw, MI 48604 | $81,236 |
14 | Hribek Farms, LLC | Linwood, MI 48634 | $80,759 |
15 | Schlatter Farms LLC | Linwood, MI 48634 | $79,805 |
16 | Kevin Wackerle | Linwood, MI 48634 | $74,214 |
17 | M & D Huber Farms | Auburn, MI 48611 | $73,903 |
18 | Thomas Vanochten | Essexville, MI 48732 | $72,770 |
19 | Meyer Brothers LLC | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $72,680 |
20 | Trombley Farms Inc | Reese, MI 48757 | $71,473 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>