Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Bay County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 384
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Bay County, Michigan totaled $7,503,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | W W Schultz & Sons Inc | Linwood, MI 48634 | $71,257 |
22 | D & D Schultz Farms | Linwood, MI 48634 | $69,427 |
23 | K & H Farms | Midland, MI 48642 | $67,296 |
24 | Kurt Schmidt | Bentley, MI 48613 | $65,686 |
25 | D T Rouech Farms LLC | Bay City, MI 48708 | $64,962 |
26 | Keith Durussel | Reese, MI 48757 | $64,703 |
27 | Ron Ratajczak | Essexville, MI 48732 | $63,706 |
28 | Pk Farms Inc | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $62,897 |
29 | Sweet Prairie Farms Inc | Freeland, MI 48623 | $60,106 |
30 | Harry Gaiser Jr | Bay City, MI 48706 | $60,074 |
31 | Wayne L Wackerle Jr | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $58,772 |
32 | Dzurka Bros LLC | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $57,811 |
33 | Frank Farms Inc | Bay City, MI 48706 | $57,500 |
34 | Bernie Cianek | Linwood, MI 48634 | $56,878 |
35 | Terry Histed Farms LLC | Munger, MI 48747 | $56,537 |
36 | Eugene Arthur Meylan | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $55,369 |
37 | Schindler Farms LLC | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $53,597 |
38 | Saginaw Bay Farms, LLC | Bay City, MI 48708 | $52,681 |
39 | Paul G Wackerle | Linwood, MI 48634 | $52,038 |
40 | Johnsons Farm Co LLC | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $51,302 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”