Biomass Crop Assistance Program in Delta County, Michigan, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 26

Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in Delta County, Michigan totaled $2,239,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Biomass Crop Assistance Program
1995-2023
1Wood Fiber IncNiagara, WI 54151$743,211
2Plum Creek Marketing IncCrossett, AR 71635$587,372
3Marvin Nelson Forest Products IncCornell, MI 49818$249,265
4Kleiman Forest Products IncWilson, MI 49896$114,090
5Rpr Contractors And Equipment CoEscanaba, MI 49829$109,432
6Kanerva Forest Products IncRock, MI 49880$100,363
7Sanville Logging IncCornell, MI 49818$65,078
8Giguere Logging IncEscanaba, MI 49829$56,887
9Tnt Timber Producers IncGarden, MI 49835$32,099
10Lafleur Forest Products LLCGladstone, MI 49837$27,377
11Mva Enterprises IncFelch, MI 49831$23,462
12K And K Logging LLCEscanaba, MI 49829$21,741
13Tuffy And Son LLCMc Millan, MI 49853$19,326
14Dugree Trucking And Forest ProducHermansville, MI 49847$19,314
15Gazan Timber Contracting IncCornell, MI 49818$15,652
16Roy A Nelson Jr And Son Forest PrRock, MI 49880$15,260
17Wangerin Logging IncStephenson, MI 49887$8,100
18Pomeroy Forest Products IncRapid River, MI 49878$6,509
19Superior Lumber IncGladstone, MI 49837$5,875
20Duane F Proehl Forest Products InRapid River, MI 49878$5,554

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag