Farm Subsidy information
Gratiot County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Gratiot County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,329
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gratiot County, Michigan totaled $302,782,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Crumbaugh Farms Partnership | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $2,922,449 |
2 | Double Eagle Dairy Inc | Middleton, MI 48856 | $2,676,585 |
3 | Cary Pioneer Farms Inc | Alma, MI 48801 | $2,145,195 |
4 | De Saegher Dairy Inc | Middleton, MI 48856 | $1,948,616 |
5 | Whitmore Operations Inc | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $1,889,336 |
6 | Brown Farms | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $1,879,759 |
7 | Crumbaugh Legacy Inc | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $1,815,939 |
8 | Ernest C Bebow | Alma, MI 48801 | $1,805,466 |
9 | Hooks Farms | Breckenridge, MI 48615 | $1,787,797 |
10 | Kendall English | Breckenridge, MI 48615 | $1,725,001 |
11 | Hrabal Farms | Breckenridge, MI 48615 | $1,699,111 |
12 | Brent Wilson | Carson City, MI 48811 | $1,653,540 |
13 | Butcher Farms | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $1,570,835 |
14 | Jeff Bebow | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $1,468,868 |
15 | Weburg Farms Inc | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $1,423,933 |
16 | Greg Wiles | Middleton, MI 48856 | $1,422,482 |
17 | Kale J Demott | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $1,357,183 |
18 | Bebow Farms Inc | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $1,335,564 |
19 | Bebow Dairy Farm Inc | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $1,322,610 |
20 | Lauer Farms LLC | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $1,280,947 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>