Farm Subsidy information
Huron County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Huron County, Michigan, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,353
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Huron County, Michigan totaled $24,624,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $82,707 |
| 42 | Zwemmer Dairy LLC | Elkton, MI 48731 | $81,384 |
| 43 | Roundtree Dairy LLC | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $80,919 |
| 44 | Rutkowski Farms Inc | Ubly, MI 48475 | $79,053 |
| 45 | Five Star Dairy LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $76,723 |
| 46 | Thuemmel Dairy Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $76,264 |
| 47 | Murawski Farms, Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $76,145 |
| 48 | Helena Farms LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $75,986 |
| 49 | Helena Cattle Company LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $75,986 |
| 50 | Dekkerland Partnership | Ubly, MI 48475 | $75,860 |
| 51 | Smaglinski Farms Inc | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $75,621 |
| 52 | Tom Haag Inc | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $75,313 |
| 53 | Jag Farms Inc | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $75,189 |
| 54 | Cb Gremel Farms Inc | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $75,085 |
| 55 | Schulze Farms Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $72,426 |
| 56 | Greenfield Farm Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $72,415 |
| 57 | Kohl Farms LLC | Gagetown, MI 48735 | $71,951 |
| 58 | Volmering Family Dairy Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $71,460 |
| 59 | Darrin Siemen | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $70,308 |
| 60 | Shupe Dairy Inc | Elkton, MI 48731 | $67,751 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf