Production Flexibility Program in Jackson County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 877
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Jackson County, Michigan totaled $14,901,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hasenick Brothers | Albion, MI 49224 | $590,401 |
| 2 | Howe Farms | Horton, MI 49246 | $449,140 |
| 3 | Weir Farms | Hanover, MI 49241 | $441,438 |
| 4 | Bingham Lockwood | Jackson, MI 49201 | $247,087 |
| 5 | Glynn Trolz And Assoc Inc | Jackson, MI 49204 | $240,013 |
| 6 | Robert Baum | Parma, MI 49269 | $237,803 |
| 7 | Cunningham Farms | Concord, MI 49237 | $235,340 |
| 8 | Jerold L Buck | Horton, MI 49246 | $229,600 |
| 9 | Robert M Hannewald | Grass Lake, MI 49240 | $196,814 |
| 10 | Doan - Teller Farms, LLC | Hanover, MI 49241 | $187,330 |
| 11 | North Concord Farms Inc 1 | Concord, MI 49237 | $177,285 |
| 12 | Dobbins Farm Inc | Concord, MI 49237 | $177,285 |
| 13 | Robert Melvin Zenz | Grass Lake, MI 49240 | $170,913 |
| 14 | Mark Stephen Sears | Horton, MI 49246 | $163,482 |
| 15 | Gary Trolz | Jackson, MI 49203 | $162,361 |
| 16 | Robert James Zenz | Grass Lake, MI 49240 | $160,102 |
| 17 | Katherine J Glisson | Dimondale, MI 48821 | $152,586 |
| 18 | Thomas Allen Zenz | Grass Lake, MI 49240 | $139,360 |
| 19 | Glen Chrisinske | Munith, MI 49259 | $133,039 |
| 20 | Max Hotchkin & Sons | Concord, MI 49237 | $123,078 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf