Farm Subsidy information
Lapeer County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Lapeer County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 290
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lapeer County, Michigan totaled $6,823,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Donald R Slesinski | North Branch, MI 48461 | $2,070 |
202 | George M Robinet | North Branch, MI 48461 | $2,067 |
203 | Perry Turner | North Branch, MI 48461 | $2,031 |
204 | Walter Bublitz | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $2,020 |
205 | Delong's Dairy Farm | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $1,953 |
206 | Leland Ford | North Branch, MI 48461 | $1,921 |
207 | Richard W Haack | North Branch, MI 48461 | $1,888 |
208 | Dennis L Kreiner | North Branch, MI 48461 | $1,816 |
209 | Margaret M Alcodray | Columbiaville, MI 48421 | $1,787 |
210 | Robert Dale Gleason | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $1,766 |
211 | Christopher A Smith | Silverwood, MI 48760 | $1,732 |
212 | Frank Zawodny | North Branch, MI 48461 | $1,731 |
213 | Raymond S Reed | North Branch, MI 48461 | $1,709 |
214 | Richard Kaufman | Brown City, MI 48416 | $1,605 |
215 | Kith Farms | Berlin, MI 48002 | $1,559 |
216 | Dale Duckert | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $1,538 |
217 | Jeff Hodge | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $1,534 |
218 | T Neil Wagner | Metamora, MI 48455 | $1,528 |
219 | Raub Rae Farm LLC | Brown City, MI 48416 | $1,511 |
220 | Matthew Thomas Newbegin | Clifford, MI 48727 | $1,491 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”