Total Commodity Programs in Lapeer County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 268
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Lapeer County, Michigan totaled $4,145,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Van Dyk Ag Properties LLC | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $718,237 |
| 2 | Muxlow Stock Farm Inc | Marlette, MI 48453 | $177,370 |
| 3 | R Schapman Ptr Dba Ingleside Farms | Bruce Twp, MI 48065 | $116,735 |
| 4 | Campbell's Greenhouses, LLC | North Branch, MI 48461 | $115,088 |
| 5 | Muxlow Farms Inc | Marlette, MI 48453 | $89,468 |
| 6 | William Ankley | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $89,058 |
| 7 | Siegler Dairy Farm LLC | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $77,715 |
| 8 | Norman Walton & Sons Llp | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $75,130 |
| 9 | Thomas Stoldt | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $71,141 |
| 10 | Doherty Farms LLC | Brown City, MI 48416 | $66,489 |
| 11 | Ken Jostock | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $64,621 |
| 12 | Spezia-bruce & Sons | Brown City, MI 48416 | $58,069 |
| 13 | David W Brusie & Sons Inc | North Branch, MI 48461 | $57,553 |
| 14 | Brown City Sod, Inc | Brown City, MI 48416 | $53,591 |
| 15 | Ivory Bros | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $52,202 |
| 16 | Edward A Adamic | Silverwood, MI 48760 | $52,065 |
| 17 | Spencer Farms Inc | Almont, MI 48003 | $48,631 |
| 18 | Patrick V Bell | Bruce Twp, MI 48065 | $46,466 |
| 19 | Barber Farms LLC | Columbiaville, MI 48421 | $46,336 |
| 20 | Mark June | Columbiaville, MI 48421 | $46,146 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf