Farm Subsidy information
Lapeer County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Lapeer County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,340
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lapeer County, Michigan totaled $128,604,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Tim Campbell Farm LLC | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $164,833 |
142 | Schmandt Farms LLC | Vassar, MI 48768 | $162,159 |
143 | Larry Paul Kohler | Brown City, MI 48416 | $161,082 |
144 | Thomas C Valentine | Fostoria, MI 48435 | $157,990 |
145 | Duane M Laur | North Branch, MI 48461 | $157,559 |
146 | Brown City Sod, Inc | Brown City, MI 48416 | $155,711 |
147 | Charles Snoblen | North Branch, MI 48461 | $153,512 |
148 | Ronald Pichla | Brown City, MI 48416 | $153,075 |
149 | Carl Foster | Brown City, MI 48416 | $151,754 |
150 | Austin Grant Stroman | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $151,731 |
151 | David Pape | Silverwood, MI 48760 | $149,989 |
152 | Robert E Cooper | Ceresco, MI 49033 | $148,685 |
153 | Norman Howard Haack | North Branch, MI 48461 | $144,326 |
154 | George M Sivec | Capac, MI 48014 | $139,949 |
155 | Robert D Vlieg D/b/a Valley Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $138,033 |
156 | Levern Tucker | Almont, MI 48003 | $135,786 |
157 | Perry W Heckman | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $134,016 |
158 | Jeff Hodge | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $128,894 |
159 | Charles Oberle | Clifford, MI 48727 | $128,610 |
160 | Valentine Farms LLC | Fostoria, MI 48435 | $127,783 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”