Farm Subsidy information
Lapeer County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Lapeer County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,340
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lapeer County, Michigan totaled $128,604,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Muxlow Stock Farm Inc | Marlette, MI 48453 | $755,663 |
22 | Gary V Stoldt | Port Huron, MI 48060 | $732,416 |
23 | Van Dyk Ag Properties LLC | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $718,237 |
24 | William Ankley | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $704,109 |
25 | Solon Farms LLC | Clifford, MI 48727 | $696,811 |
26 | David J Penzien | Attica, MI 48412 | $685,027 |
27 | Edward A Adamic | Silverwood, MI 48760 | $684,091 |
28 | Vandamme Farms Enterprise | Brown City, MI 48416 | $635,445 |
29 | Sharon Stoldt | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $623,545 |
30 | Frederick A Snoblen | North Branch, MI 48461 | $613,238 |
31 | Timothy L Harmon | North Branch, MI 48461 | $604,514 |
32 | Phoenix Farms LLC | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $602,291 |
33 | Gary Bulzan | Attica, MI 48412 | $593,487 |
34 | Dennis L Kreiner | North Branch, MI 48461 | $584,077 |
35 | Stoldt Farms Inc | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $575,360 |
36 | Siegler Dairy Farm LLC | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $571,383 |
37 | Swoish Farms LLC | North Branch, MI 48461 | $564,673 |
38 | Richard L Bristol | Almont, MI 48003 | $558,543 |
39 | Elizabeth Bulzan | Attica, MI 48412 | $558,439 |
40 | Lawson Bennett | Mayville, MI 48744 | $554,275 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”