Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Lapeer County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 223
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Lapeer County, Michigan totaled $3,480,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Van Dyk Ag Properties LLC | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $718,237 |
2 | Muxlow Stock Farm Inc | Marlette, MI 48453 | $148,486 |
3 | Campbell's Greenhouses, LLC | North Branch, MI 48461 | $115,088 |
4 | Norman Walton & Sons Llp | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $75,130 |
5 | Siegler Dairy Farm LLC | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $74,773 |
6 | Muxlow Farms Inc | Marlette, MI 48453 | $67,718 |
7 | Ken Jostock | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $61,941 |
8 | Spezia-bruce & Sons | Brown City, MI 48416 | $56,349 |
9 | Brown City Sod, Inc | Brown City, MI 48416 | $53,591 |
10 | Ivory Bros | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $51,106 |
11 | Bednaryczk Farms LLC | Marlette, MI 48453 | $45,275 |
12 | Spencer Farms Inc | Almont, MI 48003 | $44,407 |
13 | Robert Charles Wilson | Berlin, MI 48002 | $43,450 |
14 | David W Brusie & Sons Inc | North Branch, MI 48461 | $43,255 |
15 | William Ankley | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $42,305 |
16 | Patrick V Bell | Bruce Twp, MI 48065 | $41,861 |
17 | Mark June | Columbiaville, MI 48421 | $41,537 |
18 | Kyle Farms Inc. | Armada, MI 48005 | $40,666 |
19 | Thomas Stoldt | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $40,380 |
20 | Sharon Stoldt | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $40,380 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>