Farm Subsidy information
Lapeer County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Lapeer County, Michigan, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 279
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lapeer County, Michigan totaled $6,826,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Laur Family Farms LLC | North Branch, MI 48461 | $65,817 |
| 22 | Ivory Bros | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $65,715 |
| 23 | Kenneth Penzien | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $62,627 |
| 24 | Kingsbury Farms LLC | Attica, MI 48412 | $62,526 |
| 25 | Trent Shoemaker Dba Shoemaker Farms | Brown City, MI 48416 | $56,229 |
| 26 | John F Ferkowicz | Silverwood, MI 48760 | $56,013 |
| 27 | Swoish Farms LLC | North Branch, MI 48461 | $55,838 |
| 28 | Siegler Dairy Farm LLC | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $54,853 |
| 29 | Doherty Farms LLC | Brown City, MI 48416 | $53,319 |
| 30 | William Ankley | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $51,600 |
| 31 | David J Penzien | Attica, MI 48412 | $49,486 |
| 32 | Robert E Nelson & Sons | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $47,778 |
| 33 | Delong's Dairy Farm | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $47,505 |
| 34 | Frederick A Snoblen | North Branch, MI 48461 | $44,243 |
| 35 | Edward A Adamic | Silverwood, MI 48760 | $43,559 |
| 36 | Thomas Stoldt | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $43,264 |
| 37 | Sharon Stoldt | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $43,264 |
| 38 | Tracy G Sohn | North Branch, MI 48461 | $43,165 |
| 39 | David J Wilcox | Almont, MI 48003 | $42,211 |
| 40 | Thomas Cichoracki | North Branch, MI 48461 | $41,720 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf