Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Lapeer County, Michigan, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 186
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Lapeer County, Michigan totaled $1,080,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Patrick V Bell | Bruce Twp, MI 48065 | $54,738 |
2 | Vandamme Farms Enterprise | Brown City, MI 48416 | $46,777 |
3 | Ken Jostock | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $44,815 |
4 | Swoish Farms LLC | North Branch, MI 48461 | $31,090 |
5 | Sharon Stoldt | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $29,348 |
6 | Spezia-bruce & Sons | Brown City, MI 48416 | $25,784 |
7 | Siegler Dairy Farm LLC | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $24,999 |
8 | Daniel Steckly | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $23,752 |
9 | Barbara J Knust | Almont, MI 48003 | $23,703 |
10 | Muxlow Dairy Farm Ltd Ptnrsp | Brown City, MI 48416 | $23,173 |
11 | R Schapman Ptr Dba Ingleside Farms | Bruce Twp, MI 48065 | $23,140 |
12 | Spencer Farms Inc | Almont, MI 48003 | $21,733 |
13 | Kingsbury Farms LLC | Attica, MI 48412 | $21,071 |
14 | Gary Bulzan | Attica, MI 48412 | $19,469 |
15 | Solon Farms LLC | Clifford, MI 48727 | $19,153 |
16 | Bednaryczk Farms LLC | Marlette, MI 48453 | $18,002 |
17 | Robert Charles Wilson | Berlin, MI 48002 | $17,671 |
18 | Hoeksema & Jager Inc | Imlay City, MI 48444 | $17,307 |
19 | Terry Dale Jostock | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $16,242 |
20 | Trent Shoemaker Dba Shoemaker Farms | Brown City, MI 48416 | $15,763 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>