Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Mecosta County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 24
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Mecosta County, Michigan totaled $219,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jerry Mitchell | Hersey, MI 49639 | $33,145 |
| 2 | Keith Hanenburg | Coopersville, MI 49404 | $29,435 |
| 3 | Bruce F Carey | Morley, MI 49336 | $25,853 |
| 4 | Maple Crest Farms LLC | Blanchard, MI 49310 | $20,634 |
| 5 | Chapin Family Farms LLC | Remus, MI 49340 | $16,128 |
| 6 | Jernstadt Dairy LLC | Big Rapids, MI 49307 | $13,397 |
| 7 | Paul Main | Six Lakes, MI 48886 | $12,303 |
| 8 | David B Hahn | Evart, MI 49631 | $11,740 |
| 9 | Dale Woods | Reed City, MI 49677 | $11,517 |
| 10 | Eldred Farms | Blanchard, MI 49310 | $10,947 |
| 11 | Rick Foos | Big Rapids, MI 49307 | $8,153 |
| 12 | Christina L Martin | Remus, MI 49340 | $6,367 |
| 13 | Bwt Farms LLC | Barryton, MI 49305 | $3,894 |
| 14 | Moon Lit Woods LLC | Reed City, MI 49677 | $3,018 |
| 15 | Donald E Foos | Big Rapids, MI 49307 | $2,762 |
| 16 | Rehkopf Farms LLC | Hersey, MI 49639 | $2,609 |
| 17 | Doeke Pier Prins | Lakeview, MI 48850 | $2,057 |
| 18 | Kevin Todd | Reed City, MI 49677 | $1,584 |
| 19 | Aaron Rehkopf | Hersey, MI 49639 | $788 |
| 20 | Adam C Rehkopf | Hersey, MI 49639 | $788 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf