Farm Subsidy information
Menominee County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Menominee County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 141
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Menominee County, Michigan totaled $4,747,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Earl St John Forest Products Inc | Spalding, MI 49886 | $52,875 |
22 | Deno & Sons Trucking | Wilson, MI 49896 | $52,875 |
23 | Robert A Paidl | Wallace, MI 49893 | $44,955 |
24 | James Revall | Stephenson, MI 49887 | $44,671 |
25 | Arnold Forest Products | Hermansville, MI 49847 | $42,077 |
26 | Scott Havelka | Wallace, MI 49893 | $41,353 |
27 | David S Cappaert | Stephenson, MI 49887 | $39,629 |
28 | Jaime Kleikamp | Wilson, MI 49896 | $37,415 |
29 | Steven R Brock | Daggett, MI 49821 | $36,647 |
30 | Perry Erickson | Wallace, MI 49893 | $33,262 |
31 | Donald Kozlowski | Stephenson, MI 49887 | $31,940 |
32 | Lafave Logging Inc | Bark River, MI 49807 | $31,895 |
33 | Klee Logging & Tree Service Inc | Wilson, MI 49896 | $29,926 |
34 | Scott Mellgren | Stephenson, MI 49887 | $28,059 |
35 | Curtis Patz | Wallace, MI 49893 | $27,926 |
36 | Freis Dairy LLC | Wallace, MI 49893 | $26,677 |
37 | Jason Welch | Perronville, MI 49873 | $26,535 |
38 | Darrell Havelka | Wallace, MI 49893 | $24,504 |
39 | Vandermissen Farm | Wilson, MI 49896 | $23,277 |
40 | Dennis Motto Trucking, Inc. | Wilson, MI 49896 | $22,523 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”