Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Tuscola County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 551
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Tuscola County, Michigan totaled $4,464,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bay Shore Farms Inc | Unionville, MI 48767 | $101,839 |
| 2 | Zwerk & Sons Farms | Vassar, MI 48768 | $82,237 |
| 3 | Fritz Kovach Farms Inc | Unionville, MI 48767 | $75,373 |
| 4 | Zimba Dairy Inc | Deford, MI 48729 | $60,797 |
| 5 | Russell & Sons Farms LLC | Akron, MI 48701 | $58,894 |
| 6 | Clearwater Farms Inc | Caro, MI 48723 | $58,600 |
| 7 | Darwin S Hecht | Millington, MI 48746 | $58,085 |
| 8 | Palm Acres LLC | Vassar, MI 48768 | $55,586 |
| 9 | R & R Humpert Farms LLC | Fairgrove, MI 48733 | $50,125 |
| 10 | Milligan Farms LLC | Cass City, MI 48726 | $49,048 |
| 11 | Sylvester Farms | Fairgrove, MI 48733 | $48,315 |
| 12 | Burns Sons LLC | Millington, MI 48746 | $43,378 |
| 13 | Ruggles Beef Farms LLC | Kingston, MI 48741 | $43,317 |
| 14 | Lakke Ewald Farms Inc | Unionville, MI 48767 | $42,106 |
| 15 | Vader And Son LLC | Akron, MI 48701 | $41,345 |
| 16 | Robert Woodward | Cass City, MI 48726 | $41,230 |
| 17 | W M W Bierlein Farms Ltd | Reese, MI 48757 | $39,151 |
| 18 | Bernia Family Farms Inc | Akron, MI 48701 | $38,573 |
| 19 | Saginaw Valley Seedcorn Producers LLC | Fairgrove, MI 48733 | $38,280 |
| 20 | Rayl Farms Inc | Akron, MI 48701 | $35,102 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf