Conservation Reserve Program in Becker County, Minnesota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 508
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Becker County, Minnesota totaled $1,659,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kay L Sunram | Ponsford, MN 56575 | $28,231 |
| 2 | Doug Morrison | Waubun, MN 56589 | $24,008 |
| 3 | Barry Nelson | Audubon, MN 56511 | $23,024 |
| 4 | Richard Lorentzen | Edina, MN 55436 | $22,682 |
| 5 | David P Lorentzen | Montrose, CO 81401 | $20,861 |
| 6 | Eugene Pavelko | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $20,632 |
| 7 | Keith G Gulbranson And Denise L Gulbranson Revocab | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $20,361 |
| 8 | Gregory S Grieser | Audubon, MN 56511 | $19,836 |
| 9 | Cameron Ullrich | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $19,728 |
| 10 | Kelly J Myers | Saint Paul, MN 55124 | $18,463 |
| 11 | Rvoc Living Tr Dated 6 April 2009 Of Loren C Jetvi | Hawley, MN 56549 | $18,307 |
| 12 | Joel Crabtree | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $16,969 |
| 13 | Lorenz Sunram | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $16,967 |
| 14 | Michael Hutchinson | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $16,954 |
| 15 | Terry Alder | Callaway, MN 56521 | $16,849 |
| 16 | Daisy Alder | Callaway, MN 56521 | $16,357 |
| 17 | Feldt Dairy Inc | Frazee, MN 56544 | $14,948 |
| 18 | John Mcarthur | Ogema, MN 56569 | $14,935 |
| 19 | Joseph H Thorman | Moorhead, MN 56560 | $14,469 |
| 20 | William Lindow | Frazee, MN 56544 | $13,527 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf