Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Big Stone County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 243
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Big Stone County, Minnesota totaled $4,176,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lismore Hutterian Brethren Inc | Clinton, MN 56225 | $617,773 |
2 | Big Stone Hutterian Brethren Inc II | Graceville, MN 56240 | $437,171 |
3 | Diekmann Farms Inc | Beardsley, MN 56211 | $431,325 |
4 | Thomas Herberg | Beardsley, MN 56211 | $110,017 |
5 | Kevin Taffe | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $79,102 |
6 | Alan Webster | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $71,705 |
7 | Randal Rolfsmeier | Correll, MN 56227 | $65,755 |
8 | Squeaky Farms LLC | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $55,542 |
9 | Evan Holker | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $55,213 |
10 | Douglas L Nelson | Clinton, MN 56225 | $53,039 |
11 | Keith Homan | Beardsley, MN 56211 | $41,990 |
12 | Bear Claw Farms LLC | Graceville, MN 56240 | $41,873 |
13 | Justin Bakeberg | Correll, MN 56227 | $41,424 |
14 | Travis Rolfsmeier | Correll, MN 56227 | $41,206 |
15 | Raymond Arens | Graceville, MN 56240 | $34,668 |
16 | Baby Blue Farms Inc | Clinton, MN 56225 | $34,184 |
17 | Bruce Herberg | Beardsley, MN 56211 | $30,952 |
18 | Steven Sitter | Ortonville, MN 56278 | $30,416 |
19 | Iver Kellen | Clinton, MN 56225 | $29,055 |
20 | Mark Allen Chase | Clinton, MN 56225 | $28,507 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>