Farm Subsidy information
Brown County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Brown County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,378
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $27,064,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dain Kenneth Moldan | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $124,335 |
22 | Michael H Lilleodden | Hanska, MN 56041 | $120,782 |
23 | Dean Sellner LLC | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $116,927 |
24 | Steven L Seifert | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $116,554 |
25 | Brian L Nelson | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $115,637 |
26 | Michael Gerard Griebel | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $113,405 |
27 | Clyde A Larson | Hanska, MN 56041 | $112,494 |
28 | Joseph Braulick | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $111,960 |
29 | Suess Farms Inc | Hanska, MN 56041 | $111,686 |
30 | Steven A Lax | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $110,912 |
31 | Susan Anderson | Springfield, MN 56087 | $107,025 |
32 | Patrick Mohr | Hanska, MN 56041 | $104,063 |
33 | Mike L Sellner | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $103,241 |
34 | Schwartz Brothers Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $101,242 |
35 | Triple A Farms | Springfield, MN 56087 | $95,757 |
36 | Weak Enterprises Inc | Hanska, MN 56041 | $94,913 |
37 | D & D Wendinger Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $88,496 |
38 | Bruce Menk | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $88,296 |
39 | Timothy Alan Vogel | Springfield, MN 56087 | $88,094 |
40 | Scott Russell Rose | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $84,979 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”