Farm Subsidy information
Brown County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Brown County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 938
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $17,172,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Landen Thomas Berle | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $21,565 |
102 | Chad M Hoffmann | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $21,509 |
103 | David D Tauer | Hanska, MN 56041 | $21,466 |
104 | Howard And Connie Johnson Trust | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $21,324 |
105 | Jerome B Fischer | Springfield, MN 56087 | $21,200 |
106 | James Wendinger | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $21,084 |
107 | Dean Domeier | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $21,080 |
108 | Gregory Alan Scholtz | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $20,828 |
109 | Bruce A Kuelbs | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $20,781 |
110 | Gary Kuelbs | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $20,781 |
111 | Bradley A Stark | Sanborn, MN 56083 | $20,763 |
112 | Steven Ralph Carson | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $20,379 |
113 | Noah W Krzmarzick | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $20,218 |
114 | Larry Reinarts | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $20,164 |
115 | James P Sellner | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $20,029 |
116 | Wellmann Heritage Farms LLC | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $19,918 |
117 | Flying C Farms Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $19,912 |
118 | Gene Rolloff | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $19,489 |
119 | Groebner Farms Partnership | Springfield, MN 56087 | $19,121 |
120 | Mary F Davis | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $18,994 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”