Farm Subsidy information
Brown County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Brown County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 938
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $17,172,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Phyllis A Augustin | Springfield, MN 56087 | $18,915 |
122 | Gary Wilfahrt | Hanska, MN 56041 | $18,815 |
123 | Myron Windschitl | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $18,727 |
124 | Dean D Braun | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $18,558 |
125 | Dean D Schumacher | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $18,326 |
126 | Ricky Lendt | Lamberton, MN 56152 | $18,264 |
127 | Wayne Braun | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $18,240 |
128 | Schumacher Dairy Inc | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $18,187 |
129 | Darryl Schwartz | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $18,053 |
130 | William L Hoffmann | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $17,780 |
131 | Jeff Lux | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $17,738 |
132 | Alan R Kuehn | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $17,735 |
133 | Mark Kuehn | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $17,735 |
134 | Voge Investments LLC | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $17,610 |
135 | Roiger Farms Inc | Springfield, MN 56087 | $17,547 |
136 | David Helget | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $17,462 |
137 | J Richard Seitz | Lafayette, MN 56054 | $17,418 |
138 | Mitchell K Beranek | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $17,182 |
139 | Andrew J Brandl | Springfield, MN 56087 | $17,132 |
140 | Tauer Brothers | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $17,009 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”