Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Chisago County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 207
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $1,539,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Central Turf Farms | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $183,389 |
2 | Klm Farms Inc | North Branch, MN 55056 | $151,284 |
3 | Bruce M Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $42,131 |
4 | Diane J Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $42,131 |
5 | Kevin Mann | North Branch, MN 55056 | $39,890 |
6 | Thomas A Carlisle | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $37,286 |
7 | Gordon Rehbein Farms - C/o Matt Rehbein | Hugo, MN 55038 | $34,454 |
8 | Kgl Farms | North Branch, MN 55056 | $33,326 |
9 | John P Peterson Jr | North Branch, MN 55056 | $27,589 |
10 | Martin W Johnson | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $26,839 |
11 | Barry Engdahl | Rush City, MN 55069 | $26,479 |
12 | Edwin G Eichten | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $24,865 |
13 | Kevin Rochel | Shafer, MN 55074 | $24,070 |
14 | Jonathan C Moulton | Rush City, MN 55069 | $23,113 |
15 | Jason May | Rush City, MN 55069 | $20,090 |
16 | Sandberg Farms | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $19,852 |
17 | Dennis Lemon | Rush City, MN 55069 | $18,587 |
18 | Barrett K Weness | Saint Croix Falls, WI 54024 | $18,533 |
19 | Cramaur Farm LLC | Rush City, MN 55069 | $18,250 |
20 | Brandon Buehring | Rush City, MN 55069 | $17,076 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>