Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Chisago County, Minnesota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 203
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $282,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kgl Farms | North Branch, MN 55056 | $12,176 |
| 2 | Brian D Greene | Shafer, MN 55074 | $11,252 |
| 3 | James C Klinke | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $9,012 |
| 4 | Kevin Rochel | Shafer, MN 55074 | $7,590 |
| 5 | Beth Kempf | Harris, MN 55032 | $7,094 |
| 6 | Jason May | Rush City, MN 55069 | $7,017 |
| 7 | G. Phillip Rambosek | Shafer, MN 55074 | $6,505 |
| 8 | Petersen Farms Of Rush City Inc | Rush City, MN 55069 | $6,378 |
| 9 | Kevin Mann | North Branch, MN 55056 | $6,196 |
| 10 | Bruce M Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $6,014 |
| 11 | Diane J Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $6,014 |
| 12 | Dennis Lemon | Rush City, MN 55069 | $5,997 |
| 13 | Kent Reed | Center City, MN 55012 | $5,985 |
| 14 | Robb Medin | Center City, MN 55012 | $5,932 |
| 15 | Swenson Farms LLC | North Branch, MN 55056 | $5,288 |
| 16 | Jonathan C Moulton | Rush City, MN 55069 | $5,252 |
| 17 | Mark Moulton | Rush City, MN 55069 | $5,016 |
| 18 | Barry Engdahl | Rush City, MN 55069 | $4,894 |
| 19 | Steven Houle | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $4,829 |
| 20 | Jacob Pohl | North Branch, MN 55056 | $4,636 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf