Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Chisago County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 25
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $1,157 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dale Thiry | Stanchfield, MN 55080 | $451 |
| 2 | Mark Moulton | Rush City, MN 55069 | $158 |
| 3 | Richard Prahl | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $113 |
| 4 | Riverside Farms Limited Liability Company | Rush City, MN 55069 | $113 |
| 5 | Steven Houle | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $72 |
| 6 | David M. Schmidt | Rush City, MN 55069 | $67 |
| 7 | Bradley Gene Hunter | North Branch, MN 55056 | $33 |
| 8 | Max A Gustafson | Center City, MN 55012 | $26 |
| 9 | Kevin Rochel | Shafer, MN 55074 | $23 |
| 10 | Michael Dick | Braham, MN 55006 | $22 |
| 11 | Jason May | Rush City, MN 55069 | $19 |
| 12 | Swenson Farms LLC | North Branch, MN 55056 | $16 |
| 13 | Jeffrey R Reed | Hampton, MN 55031 | $12 |
| 14 | Bruce M Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $5 |
| 15 | Diane J Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $5 |
| 16 | G. Phillip Rambosek | Shafer, MN 55074 | $5 |
| 17 | John J Rademacher | Stanchfield, MN 55080 | $3 |
| 18 | Brian D Greene | Shafer, MN 55074 | $3 |
| 19 | Dennis Lemon | Rush City, MN 55069 | $3 |
| 20 | Jay T Flodquist | North Branch, MN 55056 | $2 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf