Farm Subsidy information
Dakota County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Dakota County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,706
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dakota County, Minnesota totaled $262,298,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | David Stein | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $587,849 |
82 | David A Hubers | Northfield, MN 55057 | $587,808 |
83 | Norbert R Kuhn | Randolph, MN 55065 | $583,601 |
84 | Betzold Bros - C/o Richard Betzol | Randolph, MN 55065 | $575,639 |
85 | David A Legvold | Northfield, MN 55057 | $575,254 |
86 | Patrick K Maher | Hastings, MN 55033 | $573,095 |
87 | Paul L Bauer | Hastings, MN 55033 | $570,039 |
88 | Square Deal Dairy | Randolph, MN 55065 | $565,517 |
89 | Prairie Farms Partnership | Hastings, MN 55033 | $564,482 |
90 | David F Kimmes | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $559,470 |
91 | James H Peine | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $555,134 |
92 | Randall E Mccoy | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $550,144 |
93 | David M Schonning | Farmington, MN 55024 | $546,130 |
94 | O & S Cattle Company - C/o Harold | South St Paul, MN 55075 | $540,640 |
95 | Vernon L Peine | Hampton, MN 55031 | $539,801 |
96 | James R Malecha | Northfield, MN 55057 | $533,911 |
97 | Michael J Conzemius | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $530,079 |
98 | Jirik Sod Farms Inc | Farmington, MN 55024 | $526,055 |
99 | Allan Swanson | Hastings, MN 55033 | $525,370 |
100 | Raymond Hall | Lakeville, MN 55044 | $523,611 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”