Dairy Programs in Houston County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 54
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Houston County, Minnesota totaled $3,142,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schulte Farms Partnership LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $127,173 |
| 2 | Hendel Farms | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $127,173 |
| 3 | Koch Dairy Inc | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $127,173 |
| 4 | Hammell Dairy Inc | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $127,173 |
| 5 | Blue View Dairy Farm LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $127,173 |
| 6 | Gerard Dairy LLC | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $125,946 |
| 7 | Heintz Badger Valley Farm LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $125,935 |
| 8 | Lester Banse | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $122,197 |
| 9 | Ingvalson Hilltop Farms Inc | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $121,548 |
| 10 | Houdek Dairy LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $121,548 |
| 11 | Hoscheit Dairy Farms LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $121,548 |
| 12 | Birchwood Gap Farm Inc | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $121,548 |
| 13 | Dev-lin Holsteins, LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $100,346 |
| 14 | Schansberg Farms Inc | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $94,796 |
| 15 | John D Diersen | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $93,244 |
| 16 | De Su Holsteins LLC | New Albin, IA 52160 | $92,982 |
| 17 | Pine Creek Farms Inc | La Crescent, MN 55947 | $91,028 |
| 18 | Meyer Farms Dairy LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $90,776 |
| 19 | Troendle Farms | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $88,421 |
| 20 | Schroeder Bros LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $79,492 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf