Counter Cyclical Program in Lake of the Woods County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 115
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Lake of the Woods County, Minnesota totaled $122,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baudette Farms | Prior Lake, MN 55372 | $15,802 |
| 2 | Pieper Farms | Williams, MN 56686 | $13,007 |
| 3 | Helmstetter Farm Inc | Roosevelt, MN 56673 | $5,706 |
| 4 | Sw Farm Partnership | Baudette, MN 56623 | $5,196 |
| 5 | Robert And Daniel Pieper Farm | Williams, MN 56686 | $4,814 |
| 6 | Rural Investment And Operations I | Baudette, MN 56623 | $4,606 |
| 7 | Steven Welberg | Baudette, MN 56623 | $3,966 |
| 8 | Barry Hasbargen | Baudette, MN 56623 | $3,823 |
| 9 | Byron Tveit | Roosevelt, MN 56673 | $3,640 |
| 10 | Arlen E Brune | Baudette, MN 56623 | $3,377 |
| 11 | Douglas Duane Mccloud | Baudette, MN 56623 | $3,316 |
| 12 | Grove Farms-pre 2012- Of Roosevel | Roosevelt, MN 56673 | $3,202 |
| 13 | Gerald Balitewicz | Baudette, MN 56623 | $3,177 |
| 14 | Alvin Pokel Jr | Clinton, WI 53525 | $2,741 |
| 15 | Bruce Gillie Inc | Williams, MN 56686 | $2,697 |
| 16 | Paul David Pedersen | Williams, MN 56686 | $2,538 |
| 17 | The Mouw Family Trust | Baudette, MN 56623 | $2,240 |
| 18 | Milo Alvin Ravndalen | Roosevelt, MN 56673 | $2,204 |
| 19 | Lakewood Farms Inc | Roosevelt, MN 56673 | $2,010 |
| 20 | Murray Schmitz | Baudette, MN 56623 | $1,972 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf