Total Conservation Programs in Mahnomen County, Minnesota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 123
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Mahnomen County, Minnesota totaled $455,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Adam Stalboerger | Waubun, MN 56589 | $27,160 |
2 | Terry Mccollum-mccollum Revocable Trust | Bejou, MN 56516 | $26,709 |
3 | Earl Steinbrenner And Mary Steinbrenner Family Rev | Fosston, MN 56542 | $23,900 |
4 | Sherry Cole | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $21,988 |
5 | Norman L Busse Testamentary Trust | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $21,615 |
6 | Michael W Geray | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $21,331 |
7 | Sandra J Pavek | Edina, MN 55436 | $17,596 |
8 | Victor Pavlish | Maple Grove, MN 55369 | $17,031 |
9 | White Earth Reservation Tribal Council | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $16,858 |
10 | Jessie Busse | Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 | $14,289 |
11 | David A Geray | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $10,098 |
12 | Leroy Lafriniere | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $8,298 |
13 | Carol Faye Geray | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $8,123 |
14 | Gary Hoban | Callaway, MN 56521 | $7,966 |
15 | Scott Daniels | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $6,616 |
16 | Darlene H Spaeth | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $6,512 |
17 | Steven L Klar | Palm Harbor, FL 34683 | $6,263 |
18 | Donald J Geray | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $6,141 |
19 | Roger Francis | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $5,589 |
20 | Diane Witherbee | Buffalo, MN 55313 | $5,400 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>