Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Nicollet County, Minnesota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 422
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Nicollet County, Minnesota totaled $3,470,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pinpoint Research Inc | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $125,000 |
2 | Rebco Valley Pork LLC | Courtland, MN 56021 | $123,346 |
3 | Peters Family Farm, Inc. | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $86,454 |
4 | Wenner-underwood Farms | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $54,701 |
5 | Tracy K Gaalswyk | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $53,902 |
6 | High Point Farms LLC | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $44,857 |
7 | Compart's Boar Store Inc | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $43,556 |
8 | Hagberg Farms | Lafayette, MN 56054 | $43,524 |
9 | Anthony Farms | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $42,155 |
10 | Molitor Farms Inc | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $41,209 |
11 | Perry Meyer Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $40,759 |
12 | L & W Farms Partnership | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $39,439 |
13 | Christopher F Krohn | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $38,742 |
14 | Forst Farms Inc | Gibbon, MN 55335 | $38,232 |
15 | Michael Bastian | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $38,023 |
16 | Bjorklund Bros | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $36,773 |
17 | Michael A Dallmann | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $34,117 |
18 | Grand Pama LLC | St Peter, MN 56082 | $33,673 |
19 | Leonard Pork Farms Inc | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $29,849 |
20 | Hendrycks Farms Inc | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $29,743 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>