Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 602
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $15,610,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Terra Mccree Holsteins LLC | Rochester, MN 55902 | $52,001 |
82 | Eldon Wilbur Malwitz | Elgin, MN 55932 | $51,974 |
83 | Joseph Fieseler | Eyota, MN 55934 | $51,728 |
84 | Cody Michael Thompson | Rochester, MN 55906 | $51,176 |
85 | Viola Cattle Company, LLC | Eyota, MN 55934 | $50,985 |
86 | Frank Fredrick Kahn Jr | Elgin, MN 55932 | $50,390 |
87 | Kenneth Andrew Oehlke | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $49,673 |
88 | Ada Trust | Zumbro Falls, MN 55991 | $49,641 |
89 | Pettit Trucking LLC | Dover, MN 55929 | $48,700 |
90 | Michael Richard Bale | Byron, MN 55920 | $48,373 |
91 | Benjamin Lee Storm | Dover, MN 55929 | $48,013 |
92 | Michel Farming LLC | Zumbro Falls, MN 55991 | $47,503 |
93 | Brian Arthur Kaul | Oronoco, MN 55960 | $47,171 |
94 | Matthew Andring | Dover, MN 55929 | $46,961 |
95 | Bryce D Decook | Byron, MN 55920 | $46,904 |
96 | Darrell Luhmann | Rochester, MN 55904 | $46,879 |
97 | Thomas A Berg | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $46,727 |
98 | Dana D Christie | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $46,618 |
99 | Michael Lloyd Blattner | Eyota, MN 55934 | $46,040 |
100 | Johnny Kahn | Rochester, MN 55906 | $45,585 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”