Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 519
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $4,085,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ferrier Farms | Dover, MN 55929 | $93,344 |
2 | R C & A Hart Farms | Elgin, MN 55932 | $77,735 |
3 | Paul Allen Wendt | Eyota, MN 55934 | $57,554 |
4 | Klassen Farms | St Charles, MN 55972 | $50,839 |
5 | Dale William Hinckley | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $48,663 |
6 | G-flowing Springs Farms Gen Ptshp | Eyota, MN 55934 | $46,826 |
7 | Matthew Dale Hinckley | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $45,037 |
8 | Robert Anthony Schimek | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $43,224 |
9 | Bourquin Farms Inc | Rochester, MN 55902 | $42,538 |
10 | Adam Rucker | Oronoco, MN 55960 | $42,333 |
11 | Michael Steve Thompson | Rochester, MN 55906 | $42,266 |
12 | Lynne Marie Thompson | Rochester, MN 55906 | $42,266 |
13 | Gar-lin Agronomy LLC | Eyota, MN 55934 | $41,524 |
14 | Liberty Farms LLC | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $39,730 |
15 | Tiedemann Farms North LLC | Zumbro Falls, MN 55991 | $39,387 |
16 | Daley Farms Llp | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $37,945 |
17 | Steven Vermilya | Dover, MN 55929 | $37,899 |
18 | Debra Sue Decook | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $37,461 |
19 | Bryan John Decook | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $37,461 |
20 | L & M Farms LLC | Byron, MN 55920 | $37,390 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>