Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 257
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $56,465 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gaylan Witt | Henning, MN 56551 | $573 |
22 | Bryce L Blickenstaff | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $568 |
23 | Justin Dittmann | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $556 |
24 | Thomas Mursu | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $551 |
25 | Hendrickx Bros Farms | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $537 |
26 | Glen Meier | Perham, MN 56573 | $508 |
27 | Guck Farms | Perham, MN 56573 | $496 |
28 | Eugene D Roller Jr | Hewitt, MN 56453 | $495 |
29 | Thomas Ament | Bluffton, MN 56518 | $488 |
30 | Keith Goeller | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $477 |
31 | Eugene Hollatz | Henning, MN 56551 | $477 |
32 | Steven Gunderson | Vining, MN 56588 | $473 |
33 | Kevin Klever | Henning, MN 56551 | $472 |
34 | Ronald E Ehnert | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $459 |
35 | Gregory Huwe | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $449 |
36 | Brent Gudmundson | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $445 |
37 | Alan Peppersack | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $441 |
38 | Jared Huwe | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $440 |
39 | Earl Kimball | Perham, MN 56573 | $428 |
40 | Larry Wallevand | Henning, MN 56551 | $427 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”